For the Love of Jesus, I am not going away

Yesterday, the Judicial Council of the United Methodist Church (UMC) released its decision on a request from the South Central Jurisdiction of the UMC concerning the application of certain paragraphs from the Discipline on the nomination, election and consecration of bishops. In shorter terms, the question had to do specifically with the nomination, election and consecration of Bishop Karen Oliveto from the Western Jurisdiction of the UMC, and the paragraphs have to do with “self avowed practicing homosexuals.”  Here is the link to the full review of the case before the Council.

There are a “lot of words” out there on this case, before the Council met and now since they have released their decision. For non United Methodists, the Judicial Council is basically our Supreme Court. They make decisions based on requests from United Methodists that question acts by bishops or pastors or annual conferences and rule on what is “lawful” or “constitutional” within the UMC. The Judicial Council doesn’t make the laws or the rules that are within the Discipline, they only make decisions as to whether entities within the church are following them, or upholding them. The General Conference is entrusted with writing or rewriting or changing the Discipline every four years.

The church, for some time, has wrestled with the issues surrounding human sexuality. This is not the first debate the “church” has had over biblical issues. The church has split over many other kinds of issues, over power, over structure, over biblical authority, over slavery, over women in the ministry, divorced people in the church and in the ministry, over the use of alcohol, playing cards or dancing. I am not making light of the conversation and deep divide that is in front of the UMC right now. I am pointing out, that the church is constantly struggling to figure out how to be the church and how to live out following Jesus Christ in a real way in each generation.

The Methodist church divided over slavery a little over 150 years ago. Each side believed they were right. Slavery is biblical, there are verses in place as to how to treat a slave appropriately. And yet…..I do not believe there is a church left that still believes that “owning” another human being is Christian. Women have been in the pulpit just a bit over a 100 years, and yet it was not until 1956 women were full members as clergy. There are still people who walk away from the church when a woman is appointed as pastor. There is plenty in the New Testament to cling to if one wants to deny women the opportunity to live out their call as pastors and preachers and teachers. It has only been since the 1970’s that divorced people could be ministers. If a pastor went through a divorce he (and at that time it was usually a he) had to turn in his credentials. Of everything that I have noted, divorce is the one thing that Jesus had some very strong and judgemental words to say. (Matthew 5: 31-32)

I was saddened by the Judicial Council’s ruling, but not surprised. Their job is to rule on what the Book of Discipline states. As someone who has been clergy for 35 years, I know what the Discipline states and have worked to change the language. Our, as in United Methodists, statements that all people are of sacred worth and that homosexuality is not compatible with Christian teachings is contradictory. Obviously I disagree, but the Discipline states what it states, so the decision by the ruling should not surprise anyone. Judicial Council’s function is not to question or change what is in the Discipline, it is only to rule on whether or not the question before them is valid and then what if any acts are in violation of the Discipline. The Western Jurisdictions College of Bishops released this statement. The College (which is the name of the group of bishops for a particular area) already has had Bishop Oliveto’s “case” under review. The sad thing is that her jurisdiction elected her with no dissenting votes, which is practically a unanimous vote. They elected Bishop Oliveto because they believed she had the gifts and the graces to lead the church forward. Her assigned annual conference also have many who agree with her giftedness for the church.

I am saddened by this because I continue to see the best and brightest and most gifted people turned away because they are gay or lesbian. Men and women are told they are sacred worth, but not holy and sacred enough to share their lives and their gifts for ministry in the church. Some congregations won’t even allow them to be on staff or in leadership. I, divorced and remarried, am allowed to stand up Sunday after Sunday and preach grace, love and hope and promise and faith and the good news of new life in Jesus. Yet, someone, who happens to have a different orientation than I, is denied that privilege not because of an action that Jesus clearly condemns, but on the basis of their “being.”

I have been told that those who think the church needs to change should just go away or start a new church. What if those who had worked diligently for slavery to be abolished had just gone away? Or those who worked for full inclusion of people regardless of the color of their skin had just gone away? Or those who worked for the full inclusion of women just went away? I have loved the United Methodist Church my whole life, I am not going away. I am not leaving. I want to be part of bridging the divide that honors what I believe is the real grace and love of Jesus for ALL people.

There are many bumps and mountains and disappointments in the long round to justice, to the reign of God. I never thought I would see in my lifetime, all the changes that have been made. I never thought I would live to see gays and lesbians being able to marry legally, to have the same basic civil rights that I enjoy. And yet, it is now the law of the land as well as the law in many countries around the world. In the church, I have seen many things that are disappointing, but I have seen a movement towards equality and justice. Baby steps, I tell myself, baby steps.

Yesterday, in Egypt, Pope Francis spoke these words, “”History does not forgive those who preach justice but then practice injustice. History does not forgive those who talk about equality but then discard those who are different.” While I know Pope Francis was not speaking about the UMC, he was speaking about equality and justice. I will continue to work for what I believe is true justice in the UMC. I will work with and walk with those who are most hurt by our lack of compassion and grace. I will not walk away or leave, because I believe that I am called to do the working of inviting, including and proclaiming God’s grace for ALL. For the Love of Jesus, I will continue to Stand Up!



Filed under Uncategorized

13 responses to “For the Love of Jesus, I am not going away

  1. Rick Saylor

    Cindy, Thanks for your words of witness. I believe your words speak well of the umc current realities, our past history of moving towards justice and inclusion, and the determination of moving into the future that we are not going away. Blessings Rick Saylor

  2. Anne Cuff

    When I became aware of the statements we have put in the BOD, that we, decided would become part of what we would support, I was so disappointed – I began to feel that I couldn’t, with integrity, remain in this church. I was raised Episcopalian, left for some years and came back joining the UMC where I have felt comfortable, able to follow Jesus and do the work of the Church as I am able.
    So when the charges against Bishop Oliveto or rather against those that elected her, were raised, I wasn’t surprised. I love my local church, and would not want to leave it, but all the discussion of the church’s current regard for homosexuality, the weight of the African and Asian churches have, believing in the sinfulness and criminality of homosexuals, I was deciding, sadly, they would never change the BOD, I would have to move on. Then I became aware of the IRD – and other conservative groups. Their agenda seems appalling – leaving, accepting division would be playing into their hands –
    Now we see this beautiful ‘For the love of Jesus, I am not going away -‘ Thank you, Rev Cindylee – You have made staying with this church a necessity, you have helped me realize my obligation is not to walk away, but to stay, and work, and pray – for the love of Jesus.

    • Thank you Anne. I can appreciate the struggle to stay. Sometimes I struggle as well. Somehow, someway I believe we can find a way to work together and move into the reign of God’s love and grace. Thank you for sharing.

  3. Judith Castor

    Thank you Cindy for your words. What I can’t help thinking about is that those who cannot/will not allow the LGBTQ community full and equal acceptance are guilty of forcing them to live a lie in order for them to live faithfully to God’s call in their life. The Jesus I love and seek to follow would never want his children to have to live their whole life as a lie. I would rather be guilty of extreme love and acceptance than being guilty of causing the pain and shame that our LGBTQ friends are forced to live.

  4. Jane

    Thank you for sharing your opinion on this subject! I appreciate it! I am so thankful with the many advances we have made on the subjects of women’s and gay rights! And know we still have a long way to go with both! I will stand with my church and pray we continue to grow in our acceptance of all people in whatever their chosen professions may be!
    Thank you

  5. Tim

    No need to decide anything . . . In the Hebrew context of the bible There was Sodom and Gomorrah, also under the law covenant Same sex attraction when acted upon was condemned and punishable by death. Nearly 1600 years later the Apostle Paul said “men who lie with men” would receive full recompense “for their error”. Since the Scriptures also remind us that the Almightly “does not change” why in the world is there even any talk about it???

    • Tim, I do not want to get into a biblical debate on a blog, or in a comment section. It is hard to always be able to interpret “words” that are printed, as opposed to have a dialogue face to face. Having said that, there are many things in the Hebrew context of the Bible we no longer uphold in terms of our lives. There are many excellent resources already written about the difference between the sexual practices and abuses known in Paul’s time and faithful committed relationships. There is talk because we as a people are so selective about which laws from the Hebrew Scripture and which laws from the New Testament we choose live by. I do thank you for taking time to read my blog and respond.

  6. Pingback: For the Love of Jesus, Not on my watch | revcindylee

  7. Pingback: For the Love of Jesus, Part Three Or Pentecost Thoughts | revcindylee

  8. Pingback: Cautiously Hopeful for the United Methodist Church | revcindylee

Leave a Reply to Judith Castor Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s